The Great Leap from Myth to History

n an article for Asia Times Online posted earlier this month, Peter Lee examines the cooling prohibition on discussion of the disastrous effects of the Great Leap Forward. The collection of hastily enacted policies resulted in mass starvation. What dutch historian Frank Dikötter has called “Mao’s Great Famine” has long been labeled “The Three Years of Natural Disasters” [三年自然灾害] by official party nomenclature. As this period moves further away on the historical horizon, public commentary, scholarship, and documentation by Chinese nationals is beginning to happen. After providing historical context, Lee points to netizen outrage provoked by a divisive Weibo post by Lin Zhibo, head of People’s Daily Gansu, claiming that accounts of the famine were “lies” used to “bash Chairman Mao”.

Africans in Southern China

On June 19, I saw the oft-retweeted images on Sina Weibo, China’s Twitter, which showed black people in Guangzhou city protesting together. My first reaction: This image was from three years ago. Only after an online search did I realize the image was of an incident from last Tuesday, where thousands of Africans amassed on the streets of Guangzhou to demand that police explain the death of a Nigerian national in their custody.

Hillary Clinton’s Last Tour As Rock Star

(With a blow-by-blow of the Cheng Guangcheng negotiations.) On May 3, the day after an artful deal to end the diplomatic crisis over Chen Guangcheng, China’s now-famous dissident, unraveled spectacularly, Hillary Rodham Clinton followed a scrum of Chinese ministers around an exhibition of clean cookstoves. These are safer, portable alternatives to the crude stoves used by hundreds of millions of women in the developing world — at grave risk to themselves, their children and the planet. Not long after becoming secretary of state in 2009, Clinton took up the cookstove cause, one of what she describes as “smart power” issues — though skeptical veterans of American foreign policy tend to deride them as soft more than smart.

Explaining the U.S. Healthcare Debate in China

The farther away one stands from the Obamacare cases, the more curious they look against the portrait we usually imagine of ourselves. By now, America’s declining place in rankings of global health is so well known at home that it has lost its rhetorical punch, but it can be striking to notice how much other countries have done in the years that we have debated. Seven years ago, China’s beleaguered health-care system was the Wild West; half the country told pollsters that they couldn’t afford to see a doctor if they fell ill. Today? The problems remain immense—rural conditions are grim, there is one general practitioner for every twenty-two thousand people, and people still go to hospitals with envelopes of cash to “tip” the doctors—but on the basic economic and philosophical questions, such as whether the country is stronger if everyone is insured, the debate ended years ago.

The South China Sea Oil Card

Over the weekend, the China National Offshore Oil Company (CNOOC) quietly announced that nine new blocks in the South China Sea were now open to foreign oil companies for exploration and development. This move reflects one of the starkest efforts by China to assert its maritime rights in these disputed waters – and constitutes a direct challenge to Vietnam’s own claims.

China Labour Bulletin

From their website:

CLB is based in Hong Kong but operates through a coalition of partner organizations and individuals across mainland China. CLB’s main role is to manage and coordinate the work of our partners, ensure they have the resources they need to carry out their work, and provide strategic guidance and technical expertise as and when required.

 

NYTimes To Launch Chinese-Language News Site

The New York Times is introducing a Chinese-language Web site, part of a continuing effort to expand its reach to international readers. The site, which is called cn.nytimes.com and will go live Thursday morning, is intended to draw readers from the country’s growing middle class, what The Times in its news release called “educated, affluent, global citizens.’’

Got a Dream and an Idea, Go to China

America is not the only great power struggling with how to handle the future of foreigners in its midst. As the Supreme Court indicated in its mixed decision Monday on Arizona’s immigration-enforcement law, the question of how we regard those who arrive on our shores has both philosophical and practical components. The philosophical argument in favor of immigration is, of course, what my colleague Steve Coll describes in Comment this week, as “America’s foundational narrative”—the notion that the unique American advantage is our commitment to absorb the best brains and ideas from abroad. But, these days, that conviction runs into versions of a less soaring, if ostensibly practical, assertion, along the lines that “we already have a domestic work force that has the same skills,” as one advocate for reduced immigration put it in the Times yesterday. (That argument, incidentally, is not well-served by a new study that confirms what every globally minded executive will tell you: the future of American innovation depends substantially on our openness to foreigners because immigrants play a role in more than three out of four patents at the nation’s top research universities.